Two experiences of university extension in Humanities contrasted according to their institutional framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58313/masquedos.2023.v8.n10.238Keywords:
Philosophical practices, humanities, non-formal learning, cultural promotion, community centres, institutionalization of university extensionAbstract
This paper analyzes two university extension projects carried out in the interior of the Province of Mendoza by teachers, graduates and students of different teacher training careers from the Philosophy and Literature College sponsored by the National University of Cuyo. In both cases, they were proposals for community philosophical practices. We start from the contextualization of these experiences in the general framework of the university extension programs that this house of studies manages and the approaches and models from which it is possible to think about this type of practices and then proceed to the description of the projects taken as analysis cases. As it is concluded in the light of this contextualization, elaborated from a historical and normative perspective, the contradictions in the ways of understanding the university extension crystallized within the institutions can manifest themselves and entail consequences in the particular projects channeled through them.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain the intellectual property of their articles, agreeing to transfer to Masquedós the rights for their publication and guaranteeing the journal the right to be the first publisher of the work. The articles are protected by a Creative Commons “Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA” license as detailed in the Editorial Policy. After an article is published, the journal authorizes its partial or total reproduction as long as the source is cited by mentioning: author(s), year, title, volume, number, and DOI; and as the source: Revista Masquedós.
The opinions expressed in the articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the journal's team.



















