The challenge of collaborative methodologies in the Afromexican worlds. A work proposal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58313/masquedos.2025.v10.n14.472Keywords:
Afro-Mexicans; epistemic transition; collaborative methodologies; informants; collaborating subjects; academic challenges; critical extension.Abstract
This text presents a proposal for collaborative research work in the Afro-Mexican community with the aim of recovering their voices on the impact of constitutional recognition (2019) on their community realities and on their process of construction as a sociopolitical subject. It starts from a problematization of the absence of change in their daily lives, their greater presence in spaces of political representation, and the weakening of their organizational bases. As part of the collaborative methodology, in its different phases, it emphasizes the construction of a heterarchical atmosphere and articulation in the research to enhance community participation in the design, research techniques, and process of interpreting the information collected. Among other challenges of collaborative research, we note the reluctance of academics to abandon methodologies based on the subject-object hierarchy and the mistrust of communities due to the long history of cognitive exploitation that has characterized their relationship with academia and critical extension.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain the intellectual property of their articles, agreeing to transfer to Masquedós the rights for their publication and guaranteeing the journal the right to be the first publisher of the work. The articles are protected by a Creative Commons “Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA” license as detailed in the Editorial Policy. After an article is published, the journal authorizes its partial or total reproduction as long as the source is cited by mentioning: author(s), year, title, volume, number, and DOI; and as the source: Revista Masquedós.
The opinions expressed in the articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the journal's team.



















